B.C. court rules Henry justified in extending vaccine mandate for health-care workers

A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ruled provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry was justified in extending a vaccine mandate for health-care workers last fall.

Fifteen health-care workers appealed to have the public health order dismissed on constitutional and other grounds.

Among other things, they claimed COVID-19 was no longer a significant risk to public health and there was no medical evidence that unvaccinated health-care workers posed a greater risk to vulnerable patients.

Justice Simon Coval ruled that while the orders did violate Charter Guarantees of Conscience and Religion, the infringement was reasonable to protect public health.

“I agree that our rights were violated in that we should have had a choice,” former registered nurse Andrea Henders told Global News.

“Where there is risk, there must be choice, and as nurses that’s kind of hammered into us in schooling and working as nurses on the job.”

Story continues below advertisement

Henders last worked in a hospital in 2021.

Click to play video: 'BC among last to require COVID-19 vaccine for health care workers'

BC among last to require COVID-19 vaccine for health care workers

Justice Coval did strike down one aspect of the order, saying it can no longer apply to workers in administrative roles or in cases where people work remotely.

The latest health and medical news emailed to you every Sunday.

According to the court documents, 1,800 workers were terminated for not adhering to the mandate.

Conservative leader John Rustad said losing those people has made the health-care crisis worse.

“We would repeal the mandate and hire those workers back,” he said.

Click to play video: 'Four COVID-19 court cases dismissed by B.C. Supreme Court'

Four COVID-19 court cases dismissed by B.C. Supreme Court

B.C.’s Minister of Health, Adrian Dix, told Global News there were many reasons the measures were taken.

Story continues below advertisement

“Members of the media covered the COVID-19 pandemic, they know how vulnerable people were in long-term care, they know how vulnerable people were in acute care, and so that’s the reason the measures were taken, and that view was supported in the courts,” Dix said.

More on Health

&copy 2024 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Source