Supervised consumption sites are “drug dens” that a future Conservative government would not fund and seek to close, party leader Pierre Poilievre said Friday.
During a visit to a park near such a site in Montreal, Poilievre said he would shutter all locations near schools, playgrounds and “anywhere else that they endanger the public.”
“Radical bureaucrats don’t have the right to open these drug dens anywhere they want,” he said.
The first supervised injection site opened in Vancouver more than 20 years ago.
The sites are intended to prevent overdoses by allowing people to bring their drugs to use under the observation of trained staff.
They also provide access to clean supplies to reduce rates of HIV and other diseases, as well as offer referrals to users seeking treatment options.
Health Canada says more than 40,000 people have died from using toxic drugs since 2016, when the agency began tracking these figures. In 2023, British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario led the country in terms of the number of deaths. Most who died were men.
A 2011 Supreme Court ruling said closing the Vancouver operation would deprive users of their Charter rights.
Poilievre said Friday that landmark decision does not mean supervised drug sites can operate anywhere without any restrictions.
He said he believes “reasonable restrictions” can be put in place to prevent them from opening “in locations that endanger the community, or where there is community opposition.”
In an exchange with a reporter, Poilievre repeatedly referred to the sites as “drug dens.”
Supervised consumption sites have become a contentious topic in this province. In February, hundreds of Richmond residents protested after the city said it was looking into the possibility of a supervised consumption site at the city’s hospital. And the B.C. Conservatives have said these sites will bring “crime and chaos.” CBC’s Joel Ballard got an inside look at a supervised consumption site to learn more about how they work.
“Wacko politicians and the Liberals and the NDP and their supporters in the media want to make it sounds like there’s a constitutional obligation that we allow these drug dens anywhere they want to go up. That is not true,” he said.
He suggested the federal government has the power to close existing sites under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, under which it grants them an exemption to operate.
Poilievre’s office did not divulge specifics when asked how he would go about shuttering sites.
However, he did sit as a member of the Conservative government of Stephen Harper, which passed the Respect for Communities Act in the years following the Supreme Court’s decision.
The controversial law required prospective supervised consumption sites to meet 26 criteria in order to open, such as tracking crime rates and providing medical evidence, along with handing in letters from provincial health ministers, local police and other stakeholders.
39 sites in Canada
That law was panned by opposition parties and health groups for essentially blocking sites from opening. They said it bogged down the application process with paperwork and created unnecessary barriers.
But the Conservatives argued the law was needed to strike a balance between public health and public safety.
Rona Ambrose, the health minister at the time, said their intention was to allow police and parents to have their say before supervised consumption could happen in their neighbourhoods.
After they were elected in 2015, the Liberals passed their own law allowing facilities to open with more ease, citing the need to better respond to the overdose crisis.
There are now 39 supervised consumption sites, according to Health Canada, and another 10 open applications.
‘They save lives’: former minister
Jane Philpott, the former Liberal health minister who ushered in the current government’s amendments to the law, rejected Poilievre’s assertions.
“These are not ‘drug dens,’ they are health centres,” said Philpott, now the dean of health sciences at Queen’s University, in a post on X.
“They save lives. In fact, the staff have attended to about 50,000 overdoses [and] medical emergencies since 2017, with no reported fatalities on site,” she wrote, adding thousands are alive because of access to such facilities.
Gord Johns, the NDP’s critic in Parliament on the issue, suggests shutting down supervised consumption sites would only lead to people using drugs elsewhere.
With respect <a href=”https://twitter.com/PierrePoilievre?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@PierrePoilievre</a>, these are not “drug dens”, they are health centres. They save lives. In fact the staff have attended to about 50,000 overdoses & medical emergencies since 2017, with no reported fatalities onsite. Thousands of women and men are alive because of SCS. <a href=”https://t.co/fwh1NKELLM”>https://t.co/fwh1NKELLM</a>
—@janephilpott
“It becomes an absolute disaster in the bathrooms of small businesses, in our parks, in our school yards, in the back alleys, in the backyards of people’s in the community,” he said.